AGG
Volume 28, Issue 1 - January/February 2014

Metal Matters

 

The ability of a fenestration product to attenuate the transmission of sound is measured in several ways: Transmission Loss (TL), Sound Transmission Class (STC) and Outdoor-Indoor Transmission Class (OITC). In all cases, the higher the number, the more the intruding sound is blocked.

TL is a standardized measure of noise reduction in decibels for specific frequency ranges. Noise is composed of multiple sound frequencies, so the STC, a single numerical rating, is the most commonly used metric for indoor partitions and acoustic wall treatments. STC is based on sounds in the frequency range typical of human speech. Although this is generally a satisfactory way to rank the ability of building envelope components to reduce noise from sources such as neighbors’ conversations, it does not properly rate insulation against noise from the typical outdoor urban environment.

Sound Explanations
To cover this deficiency, the OITC was devised to represent the attenuation of noise from exterior sources more accurately. It is based on a spectrum weighted more to lower frequencies typical of the noise produced by cars, motorcycles, trucks, elevated trains and air traffic.

How much the intrusive outdoor sound is blocked depends on a window’s shape, its size relative to the wavelength of the sound, the glass-to-frame ratio and the way in which the glass is mounted in the sash or frame. Improved sound control tends to be an extra benefit of energy-efficient window design, as the features that reduce thermal conductivity and air infiltration also tend to reduce sound transmission.

These features include (but are not limited to):

• Double glazing (insulating glass units). Generally, the wider the air space between the inner and outer glazing, the greater the sound attenuation. However, there is a point of diminishing returns. Despite the intuitive belief that adding another layer of glass must be beneficial, triple glazing provides little additional improvement over double glazing, unless the interlayer separation is very large.

• Laminated glass. The plastic interlayer dampens vibrational energy; however, the degree of attenuation is somewhat temperature dependent; cold winter weather can diminish this benefit.

• Sealants and weatherstripping. Sound transmission through operating joints around windows may drastically reduce their sound attenuating capability, especially at higher frequencies.

• Robust framing. Strong, stiff frames resist vibration. Those with engineered profiles consisting of open spaces help reduce noise transmission in much the same way as double glazing.

• Glass thickness. Though of limited value, the use of different glass thicknesses in insulating glazing units has proven to provide greater sound control than using the same thickness for both lites, due to the different frequency response. Thicker glass on the outdoor side is said to work best.

Industry Standards for Sound Control
As with any performance parameter, a reliable methodology must be employed to obtain uniform and comparable measurements that enable evaluation of different products in a fair and consistent manner. To accomplish this, AAMA recently updated its Voluntary Specification for the Acoustical Rating of Windows, Doors and Glazed Wall Sections (AAMA 1801-13), which describes sound transmission loss measurement procedures for fenestration products.

AAMA TIR A1, Sound Control for Fenestration Products, offers additional information on the characteristics of sound, how it is transmitted, how it is measured and how its transmission can be controlled and quantified using STC and OITC indices.

Dean Lewis is the educational and technical information manager for the American Architectural Manufacturers Association in Schaumburg, Ill.

Architects' Guide to Glass & Metal
© 2014
Copyright Key Communications Inc. All rights reserved. 
No reproduction of any type without expressed written permission.