cSonotiununedd ifrnomg ptahgee17Alarm
Auburn, Wash., says some code requirements
accept a variety of different frames for an open-
ing, while others provide limited options.
“Protective-rated openings have more options
when it comes to frames,” she says. “As these
allow heat through and have lower minute rat-
ings, products such as ceramic and specialty tem-
pered glass can go into fire-rated hollow metal,
fire-rated steel, different door lite kits and several
other options. Fire-resistive-rated openings on the
other hand, are meant to block against radiant
heat and meet either ASTM E119 or ‘temperature
rise’ requirements for doors. In this instance, the
intumescent glass products must go in their man-
ufacturer’s thermally broken frame assembly per
its testing and listing. Fire-rated openings also
often require the use of intumescent gaskets and
intumescent glazing tape to protect against auto-
ignition amongst the materials.”
There to Help
Architects are often operating under a strict
budget. Nass says after manufacturers assist them
in selecting the appropriate product to meet the
code requirements, they look at options such as
configuration, finish and glass types to keep the
project on track financially.
A Barrier to Fire, Not Design
In its early stages, fire-rated glazing failed to
provide architects the sleek, clean lines and open
expanses of non-rated glazing systems. Today’s
products have overcome these limitations.
“The clarity, size and optical quality of fire-rated
glazing has improved dramatically over the last
decade, and architects now have a wide range of ver-
satile fire-rated framing options at their disposal,”
says Razwick. “Fire-rated frames are much thinner
than in years past, and they can incorporate custom
cover caps and surface finishes to match surround-
ing curtainwall and door applications. Some
advanced options even make it possible for design
teams to achieve the smooth, frame-free aesthetic of
non-rated silicone-glazed curtainwall systems.”
Graff says that when the project is over budget,
fire-rated products are among the first to be
reviewed. However, manufacturers can assist with
specific modifications that can help save money
and maintain the original design intent.
“For example, in resistive-rated openings, the
intumescent products can sometimes be installed
with the use of continuous steel iron angles and
still be thermally broken, therefore eliminating
the cost of the fire-rated framing,” she says. “In
some cases, it is a minor adjustment in dimen-
sions that can make all the difference. Reaching
out to these resources will benefit everyone
involved, as they want to keep their product on
the project and you want to find ways to mini-
mize cost without having to sacrifice design.”
Razwick agrees that this collaboration is good
for both sides.
Fire-rated glazing
manufacturers
embrace the idea of
working close with
architects to help
projects meet various
performance criteria
and cost constraints.
“
The desire to have these code-driven products
blend seamlessly into their overall design is para-
mount,” adds Nass. “We are always looking for
ways to minimize the compromise on the part of
the design team/owner.” He says a variety of fin-
ishes, glass types and other custom options can
help architects and specifiers achieve a seamless
design between the rated and non-rated systems.
Grace Graff, western regional sales manager at
Vetrotech Saint-Gobain North America in
“In many instances, these partnerships prove
beneficial for both parties, as new fire-rated glazing
products are often born from conversations about
a product that does not yet exist,” he says. AGG
Nick St. Denis is the editor of Architects’
Guide to Glass & Metal. He can be reached at
nstdenis@glass.com.
18
www.glassguides.com
Architects’ Guide to Glass & Metal